Tuesday, 24 September 2019

Photographers Research 1

Jose Reis:

José Reis is an American born in Portugal and educated in England. After a career in photojournalism and teaching- where he had exhibitions at the Birmingham Post Building, in 1971, and The Photographers’ Gallery in London, in 1973he worked as a Software Quality Assurance Engineer in the Pacific Northwest, until his retirement in November 2011. José Reis is now immersed in personal photography projects.
Reis has taken throughout the world, focusing on different subjects. He has done exhibitions based on different life styles like Faces and Voices of Papua New Guinea, Japanese Gardens and How Democratic Is Your Liberal Democracy?
His style of photography brings sharp and intense images to the audience, portraying a hidden message or story behind each one. 
I took inspiration from his photos on environmental destruction, shown below.


 I like the layering's on this picture, and how it presents how the world is being damaged. The harsh tones present how powerful the ocean in yet the small human in front of it isn't scared as he's breaking it down bit by bit. I also like the placement of objects in the waves as I get a connotation how easy it is for objects to be swept away in the ocean.

My initial thoughts to this photo was the wonder of the story behind it. I can see a human standing on the wreckage of an airplane crash but why? This shows that Reis has created a good photo as he has left the audience wanted more. The use of shows and lighting also draws you in. Having the only light as the sun shining in creates a connotation that thats always good in the bad.




What I like about this image is the tone of blue throughout. The constancy makes the image more appealing. I also like the use of composition. The whale is slightly of centre, showing that the image is not perfect- like the meaning behind it (the ruining of animals habitats) 


















This photo stands out the most to me. It presents how we are destroying the environment and that habitats of animals, breaking nature in order for more space for buildings. It is a perfect representation of industrialisation. I like how Reis uses popular landmarks like the Eiffel Tower to shows how the important things people love seeing 
have ruined a world we once knew. 





Tuesday, 17 September 2019

Work Record 1

Preparation:

To start my investigation i wanted to look at the environmental damage of a destructive world. For this shoot I will be using my Cellophane idea (shown in my mind map) to present how industrial production of chimneys etc ruin the enviroment through producing toxic gases. To do this I will be burning cellophane to create a burnt platic look and use this on top of my lens to add a filter to the picture. I will also use a tripod to make sure my photos are steady. 

Artist Research:

Brandon Seidler:
https://www.brandonseidler.com/


Brandon Seidler draws attention to the damage humans have done to the environment by photographing natural landscapes that have been altered by chemical pollution and then soaking the film in the same harsh chemicals that were found at the site. The developed film, which has been corroded by different acids, yields distorted, uncanny images of a world transformed by manmade toxins.However, I could not do this in the same way as I don't use film so cannot use acids to distort the picture. I think the images were very creative and the use of bright colours draws attention to the picture.










Experimenting how to create the filter:

  • First I used the red cellophane and a lighter to try to create the bubbled brown look like Seidler as a film on top of my camera on my lens. This worked quite well because it created the burnt look I wanted.  However the tint was too much red so I couldn't see through it or focus on the object behind it.
  • Secondly I tried burning trying different types of plastic- eg plastic wrapping, sleeve for paper. This didn't work well as both types of plastic just caught fire and didn't create any bubbles etc.
  • Next I tried the clear cellophane from a floweriest. This worked but didn't give the brown/burnt look
  • So I tried to add the brunt look. I did this by adding butter and Candle wax on top before burning the cellophane to see if it burnt more brownish. I then made coffee and gravy and put it on the already burned cellophane to try that look.
  • the end product. To create this, i burnt it, added coffee on top to dry then used face-paint to add black burnt bit around the edge and create a dirty look.
Step 1
step 4, the Candle wax




step 4, adding the coffee
End product

Trail attempt:

When going to try the filter on the lens I found that it was still hard to focus on the object behind it. So I decided that I would try taking a picture of the cellophane and the a picture without it of the Chimney and then edit the two together. Below is my trail attempt pictures and the end product.


Settings:

Shutter Speed: 1/250 
Aperature: f/8;   
ISO: 200
Focal Length: 55mm
Contact Sheet:




Editing: 

To edit my pictures I had to layer two images on top of each other and then Cut a part of the first layer, where the hole is to present the chimneys.  I did this by quick selection the part as shown below, then edit and cut. I then went on to burn and dodge using curves to make certain points of the images lighter and make the edges more dark and burnt like. I wanted my pictures to be as dark and miserable as possible tto highlight how horrible our destruction of the world is.










AO3: Record ideas, observations and insights relevant to intentions, reflecting critically on work and progress.
I think my shoot went well and reflected my idea of a dustructive world through environmental damage. My Research of Brandon Seidler was helpful in my work as it gave me my idea of a filter to distort my photos to give an adnormal effect. The images came out as I expected, however I wish I had shot on a brighter day so my photos had better exposure. I wanted my photos to show a miserable world in a way that will effect the audience in a emotional way. I think my images have portrayed this in many ways.



AO1: Develop ideas through sustained and focused investigations informed by contextual and other
 sources, demonstrating analytical and critical understanding.
My artist research is shown throughout my images, with similarities of dots and bubbles of the filter as if there was gas bubbles. I think my research of how I wanted to create my filter was also helpful for the me to figure out how I wanted my photo to turn out and what message I wanted to present. For example, adding the coffee and brown colour in order to add a burnt and dark effect.


AO4: Present a personal and meaningful response that realises intentions and, where appropriate, makes connections between visual and other elements.  

        I believe that I have produced a strong series of images inspired by my research of environmental damage and the images of Brandon Seidler. The final images I have edited present a destructive world in different ways. The use of plastic in order to create my filter creates an ironic effect of how materials are detsurctive, Burning plastic for example creates a poisonous gas, which i has to create in order to get the filter I wanted.





Final Images:








Progression:

Moving forward i will like to look at environmental damage through the use of littering and pollution.

Blur & Camera Control

Camera controls:

Image result for cross section of a dslr camera
Image result for main shutter speeds diagram
Image result for main iso diagram photography


William Klein:


Image result for william klein photography
Image result for william klein photographyImage result for william klein photography

Friday, 13 September 2019

Slow-Sync Flash

Slow-sync Flash:

Slow Sync Flash is a function found on many cameras that tells your camera to shoot with both a longer shutter speed as well as firing the flash. It helps you keep your subject sharp while capturing motion or a dark background.

Image Bank:

See the source image
See the source image
See the source image

The setting used when trying the technique:

when trying this technique i used the same setting as the multi-flash, a dark studio with a snoot on the light. My camera settings on my camera were different from what came up on the light meter. The light meter came up as f stop 5.6 however set the camera to f.8 as the aperture would be better. I set the shutter speed to 2 seconds and ISO 200

Final Images:






Multiple Flash


Multiple exposure: is a photography technique of combining two or numerous separate exposures into one.


Multi-flash is a type of photography where the subject is photographed moving as a bright flash is on, creating a sequence of the movement.
To do this technique you need to use a black screen or backdrop to keep the movement of the person distinguished. Have two flashes on the set as they naturally make the scene brighter. However, try to keep them at least 6 inches apart; this way, you don't end up with too much additional light concentrated in one area of the photo, which causes glare in your image. Multiple flashes typically are better used when they're located far away from each other.


Image Bank:

Image result for multi flash photography

Image result for multi flash photographyImage result for multi flash photography
Image result for multi flash photography
What you need:
A dSLR on manual settings (set from 2-10″ or bulb exposure)-Because you’re using flash, the aperture setting is the most important in this technique. As long as your shutter speed is slower than your camera’s flash sync-speed, aperture is what controls how the flash exposure is recorded, and it also dictates what power output to set on your flash. I suggest using an aperture somewhere between f/8 and f/16, to get the best results. A smaller aperture will also help to minimise the effect of any ambient light in your images.

-A very dark room (or nighttime outdoors)


-A tripod


-A human subject


-A strobe or flashgun (speed-light) with a test button (to manually fire the flash)


-Someone to serve as an extra pair of hands (not required but it helps a lot)

Eadweard MuyBridge:


Eadweard Muybridge was an English-American photographer important for his pioneering work in photographic studies of motion, and early work in motion-picture projection. He adopted the first name Eadweard as the original Anglo-Saxon form of Edward, and the surname Muybridge, believing it to be similarly archaic.In 1874 Muybridge shot and killed Major Harry Larkyns, his wife's lover, but was acquitted in a jury trial on the grounds of justifiable homicide.

The settings used when trying the technique:

In this technique i used a soft box flash with the settings of: 

  • Shutter speed 4 seconds
  • ISO 200
  • F16 22


Final images:





Evaluation:

I think this technique worked out well. However if i was going to do this again i would make the model space out more so that the images are not clumped or chaotic. I liked how this technique presents the different motions in the movement, including the facial expressions making the dark image (in terms of tones and colours) happy.

Tuesday, 10 September 2019

Contextual and Critical Analysis:


Definitions:

Fine art photography is photography created in accordance with the vision of the artist as photographer.
Fine art Photography is a visual art whose products are to be appreciated primarily or solely for their imaginative, aesthetic, or intellectual content.
Commercial photography is photography created with the intent of making the end user money; essentially, photography for commerce and business.
Connotation- an idea or feeling which a word invokes for a person in addition to its literal or primary meaning.
Denotation-the literal or primary meaning of a word, in contrast to the feelings or ideas that the word suggests.
Punctum is an object or image that jumps out at the viewer within a photograph
semiotics of photography is the observation of symbolism used within photography or "reading" the picture
Studium indicates the factor that initially draws the viewer to a photograph.


Mendel Grossman:



Mendel Grossman was a Jewish photographer in the Lodz (Litzmannstadt) ghetto, born in 1913. He was a slim man of less than average height with sloping shoulders, his coat hanging on him as if it were not cut to his size, even his shoes appearing too large for him.

His eyes expressed goodness, a clever smile played on his lips, his steps were measured and he always carried a stuffed briefcase.  That was Mendel Grossman, a young man of a Hasidic family, the type of a former Talmudic student who had left the straight and narrow path. He was avid for knowledge, a lover of literature, the theatre and the arts, a painter, a sculptor, and also an amateur photographer who believed that photography was an art.

His photographs flowers, still-life, landscapes, street scenes, portraits, taken against the background of clouds, were works of art filled with expression, leaving strong impressions on the viewer. Eventually Mendel Grossman began to concentrate on one subject – man in motion. The transition came abruptly, and by accident. The Habimah theatre was visiting Lodz and Mendel hidden in the wings, photographed the performances.

No one asked him to do it he did it for himself alone. Here were men and women in motion, in classical motion there was dancing, varied and strange facial expressions, laughter, fear, pain, as well as make-up, costumes, light, stage settings.


Jews relocate to the Baluty section of the Lodz Ghetto
When later he locked himself in his darkroom to develop the films he was astonished by the power of his photographs, he actually succeeded in arresting men in motion. All those who saw the pictures extolled their excellence, but Mendel knew that he was only at the beginning of this particular journey.

Habimah left, and Mendel directed his lens to the street, to the suburbs inhabited by Jews, the slums. He now found motion and expression not on the stage, but in the streets, among children playing, labourers at work in the Jewish quarter of Baluty.

His photographs gained a measure of respect, and Mendel achieved recognition as an artist- photographer. In the beginning of 1939, the management of TOZ, the Jewish organisation for the protection of children’s health, approached him with an attractive proposition – to prepare an album of pictures of Jewish children.

The accent was to be on the poor Jewish child in the streets. Mendel enthusiastically accepted the proposition and was soon ready with a series of photographs. It was the summer of 1939, the album never appeared and the photographs got lost in the war, and at the same time so did their subjects the Jewish child.


Jewish children in Lodz photographed by Grossman
The idyllic life of discussions on art ceased with the outbreak of war and the first contact with a brutal occupier, then the Star of David to denote a Jew, and the creation of ghettos. Mendel was ready with his camera. No longer did he photograph flowers, clouds, still life’s and landscapes. In the horror of the Lodz ghetto he had found his mission, to photograph and thus record the great tragedy taking place in the ghetto before his eyes.

Mendel Grossman knew how to photograph, he knew how to observe and perceive what happened around him, and what is most important – he saw the people surrounding him. He photographed them in their suffering, as they sank into the depths of pain, in their struggles, in their illnesses, and in their death.

He recorded with his camera what took place in the tortured ghetto, the Holocaust at its intensity.
He gave up his artistic ambitions of the past, his mission was now clear, to leave to the world – if a world was to remain – a tangible testimony of the great tragedy, of the horrible crime, in a language understood by all nations.

Evicted from his house in the centre of town, Mendel found a flat in the ghetto where he settled with his parents, two sisters, brother –in-law and little nephew. The story of his family is typical of Jewish families in Lodz. Mendel realised this, and intensively photographed his loved ones, so that over the years he created a horrifying record of their slow progress toward death.

Mendel obtained a job in the photographic laboratory of the department of statistics in the ghetto, the office in which all the true information concerning the ghetto was collected. Covered by its official status, the staff of the department accumulated written material.

They did not only record dry facts, as statisticians usually do, but wrote down every rumour passing through the ghetto, every change in the distribution of food rations, every event no matter how unimportant. They also collected photographs, ostensibly to demonstrate models of products of the ghetto workshops, and identification photographs for work permits. The laboratory had a good supply of film and printing paper, and also served as an ideal camouflage for Mendel’s real job.

He spent most of his time in the streets, in the narrow alleys, in homes, in soup kitchens, in bread lines, in workshops, at the cemetery. The chief subject was people. He did not seek beauty, for there was no beauty in the ghetto, there were children bloated with hunger, eyes searching for a crust of bread, living “death notices” as those near death, but still on their feet were called in ghetto slang.

He photographed conveys of men and women condemned to death in the gas-vans of Chelmno, public executions, in one incident, a whole family passed through the street dragging a wagon filled with excrement, a father, mother, son and daughter, the parents in front pulling, and the children pushing from the sides.


Saying goodbye to children held at the Lodz ghetto prison before they were deported to Chelmno in Sept 1942
Mendel stopped but did not take out his camera, he hesitated to photograph the degradation of those people. But the head of the family halted and asked Mendel to photograph, “Let it remain for the future, let others know humiliated we were.” Mendel no longer hesitated, he gave into the urge which motivated so many Jews to leave a record, to write down the events, to collect documents, to scratch a name on the wall of the prison cell, to write next to the name of the condemned the word “vengeance.”

Mendel had heart trouble and he was forbidden to make any physical effort. The Gestapo was also on his tracks and his friends warned him, his family insisted that he stop endangering his life. But he did not heed any warnings, no event in the ghetto passed without him photographing it. To fool the police he carried his camera under his coat.

He kept his hands in his pockets, which were cut open inside, and he thus could manipulate the camera. He directed the lens by turning his body in the direction he wanted, then slightly parted his coat, and clicked the shutter. This method worked very well.


Jews executed by hanging in Lodz as the crowd watches
In one of the stages of the destruction of the Jewish people the Germans deported the remnants of the Jewish communities of Germany, Austria, Czechoslovakia and Luxemburg, and brought them to the Lodz ghetto. Mendel received the arrivals with camera in hand. Here were characters of a new kind, with a different appearance, different manners. They were well dressed, they carried heavy suitcases, were well provided with food.

They were horror stricken at the sight of the ghetto, they refused contact with the old inhabitants of the ghetto whose appearance repelled them. They tried to swim against the current and quickly gave up, they collapsed spiritually and physically.

Mendel and his camera followed this process which ended when the Germans collected the pitiful remnants and again loaded them onto trains, this time the trains were bound for Chelmno. Mendel after taking a long distance photo, hidden in a room overlooking Bazarny Square of an execution of a Jew from Vienna, who had been arrested outside of the ghetto, was able to photograph another execution close up.

On a cloudy day he again ventured out with his camera this time to an open field on Marysinska Street. Unlike the first time, Mendel did not take up a protected position, but stood behind a German policeman, in the front row of the crowd.

As usual the camera was suspended from a strap around his neck, the coat was slightly parted, and his hands under the coat directed the lens to the scaffold. The condemned young man, was brought in a cart. He still did not realise what was going to happen to him. He noticed at first a large crowd, and then the dangling noose. Now he knew. Without uttering a sound he ascended the scaffold, his head down.


Grossman in his photo lab in Lodz
The crowd held its breath, the distant cries of the condemned man’s wife also ceased. The German’s were tense as the hangman tightened the noose around the victim’s neck. Mendel clicked the shutter, the silence was so absolute that even this muted sound reached the ears of a German policeman, and he turned his head.

Pale with excitement, Mendel returned to the small darkroom in his flat to develop the picture. This time the photograph was clear in every detail.

Still Mendel thought that he should change his technique, from then on he climbed electric power posts to photograph a convoy of deportees on their way to the trains, he walked roofs, climbed the steeple of a church that remained within the confines of the ghetto in order to photograph a change of guard at the barbed-wire fence.

Weak and sick, he found it difficult to accomplish all those feats, but he was contemptuous of danger and did not heed the pleadings of friends. Inside the church he discovered a strange world – a surrealistic picture which could be only the product of morbid fantasy – the entire interior was covered with a thick layer of white feathers.

Waves of feathers rose into the air with each step, each movement. Every breeze caused a cloud of feathers to form in the air. The altar of carved wood, the figures of the saints, and the huge organ – all were covered with feathers, all undulated in the breeze.

Amidst all that he saw human figures, also wrapped in white, sitting, running around, standing. A small sign attached to the entrance attempted to explain what was happening inside. It read Institute for Feather Cleaning, but the sign did not tell the whole truth. The Church was the place to which the bedding robbed from Jews who were sent to death from Lodz and surrounding towns was being brought.


Mendel Grossman works on a photo album in the Lodz Ghetto
There, in the Church of the Virgin Mary, the pillows and featherbeds were ripped open by Jewish men and women, then the feathers were cleaned, sorted, packed and shipped to Germany, to merchants who sold them in the Reich.

Mendel spent many weeks in the church, covered with feathers. He looked for varied angles which would fully explain to future generations what was happening in that church. He created evidence of the crime, the full extent of which was not yet known to him. Only his intuition told him that this must be recorded.

The collection of negatives grew from day to day its contents became richer and more varied. The negatives were hidden in round tin cans, among them a can full of negatives from the performances of Habimah in Lodz in 1938.

Mendel again and again stressed in conversations with friends that he expected those negatives eventually to reach Tel Aviv and be given to the theatre. He did not speak of the plans for the future - he only wanted his photographs to be exhibited as testimony of what took place in the ghetto.
  
The desire to record, to record at all costs, had become part of the consciousness of the inhabitants of the ghetto. All parts of the community had become permeated by this desire, and Mendel with his camera was received with open arms and with full understanding, in workshops, in hospitals, in orphanages, in offices, in the streets.

In 1942 the Germans announced a new deportation from the ghetto and the Gestapo and members of the Kripo went from house to house selecting Jews for death. Dead bodies were collected and thrown on a heap in the cemetery. Mendel decided he need to record these events, Mendel attached himself to the gravediggers and went to the cemetery, with his camera in his hand.


Station at Radegast
Carts continued to bring in bodies but Mendel first turned his attention to the open mass grave, inside were deportees from the nearby town Zdunska Wola. They had died of suffocation in the tightly packed trains.

Mendel managed to take photographs before the gravediggers did their job of covering the evidence. Then with his slow steps he went to the hall reserved for memorials but which was now filled with bodies. From the distance the sound of rifle fire was heard, the “aktion” continued.

While photographing, Mendel marked the chests with numbers. The same numbers later appeared on the graves, and thus the families were able to identify the graves by first identifying their dead on the photographs.

The head of each body was lifted by a gravedigger, and Mendel went from one to another clicking, recording the bruised, bloody, crushed faces, faces of old people, of boys, of girls. Some of the eyes were closed, some half open, some half open, some stared with fear, some exuded the serenity of death.

The great deportation “aktion” was about to end, Mendel still managed to photograph the large wagons full of Jews condemned to death as they made their way to the concentration  places and from there to the railway station at Radegast. Again the trains rolled in the direction of Chelmno and the gas-vans and crematoria of “Sonderkommando Bothman” worked at full speed.


Forced deportations of families from Lodz
There followed “regular” days in the ghetto, and one could find Mendel in the streets and ghetto institutions, his lens directed toward the starving and the sick who were not allowed to be sick because there was no room for them in the ghetto, and therefore all medical institutions were liquidated. They remained only in Mendel’s photographs.

In 1943 deportations began again, the inhabitants of the ghetto still did not know to where the deportees were being taken. There were many rumours, most of them pessimistic, but some contained grains of hope.

Mendel sensed that the omens were bad, he suspected the Germans of taking the deportees to a place from which there was no return. He photographed almost exclusively the convoys, the places where the deportees were concentrated, the ghetto jail. Friends warned him against photographing the convoys, because Gestapo men were among the guards, and they would find him out. Again he heeded no warnings. In one of the ghetto workshops, a telescopic lens was being secretly constructed for him according to a sketch he prepared.

When completed, the lens performed satisfactorily, but was heavy and awkward to carry, Mendel was happy, because he could now photograph from a distance and from hiding places. He photographed the convoys from windows, following them until the deportees entered the death trains. He was in great danger when photographing the railroad station with the German police pushing the Jews into the trains.

He took the photographs hidden behind a stack of slabs of concrete belonging to a factory of prefabricated houses. The new lens did its work well.  Mendel showed particular interest in recording the activities of youth organisations in the ghetto. He appeared at meetings, photographed events.

Grossmans father (sick) in the Lodz Ghetto
All was open to him, the young people trusted him and Mendel discovered suddenly smiling faces, faith in the future, and care for fellow men. There were no longer orphanages and old people’s homes in the ghetto, and so he photographed the children in the workshops to which the entire population was mobilised.

Mendel infiltrated the parties of the ghetto elite, photographed their shameful mode of living, which was a mockery of the sufferings of the starving population. Many of Mendel’s pictures showed the institutions of the ghetto authorities. They stressed the bitter irony of the “autonomy” given to the Jews within the barbed-wire fence, the empty paraphernalia, offices, police, parades and uniforms.

He generously distributed copies of his photographs, he asked for no payments he let the pictures be kept by as many people as possible. Perhaps some would remain after the holocaust. Mendel spent his evenings locked in his darkroom, working till late at night. In the mornings he distributed prints among friends and acquaintances and kept only the negatives for himself.

He kept next to his enlarging apparatus a little crystal set with an earphone which was capable of receiving only the German radio station in Lodz. Thus he was informed on the progress of the war, but he did not indulge in commenting on the subject. His drawers were full of tin cans with more than then thousand negatives, the result of hard and stubborn work since the occupation. Those cans contained the images of people whose ashes were already scattered in the forests of Chelmno.

In them was the story of the suffering and destruction of a great Jewish community, the most telling proof of the greatest crime in human history. With the Red Army advancing on the eastern front, Mendel knew that he must now hide his precious negatives in a safe place. Mendel made a quick selection of negatives, packed the tin cans in a wooden crate.

With the help of a friend he took out a window sill in his apartment, removed some bricks, placed the crate in the hollow, then replaced the sill. The task was accomplished. The negatives seemed safe for the future. But Mendel retained his camera. The days of the Lodz ghetto final liquidation came, there was chaos everywhere, Mendel continued to photograph to the very end. He could no longer develop the film, the ghetto was almost empty.

Trains left twice a day for an unknown destination, one of the last to leave was Mendel, his camera hidden under his coat. Several days later the Gestapo found out about his activities when they found in some abandoned flats prints of his photographs – the definitive proof of their own crimes. Mendel was sent to the Konigs Wusterhausen labour camp, in the Reich where he secretly continued photographing, but not developing and printing.


One of several GFH publications
When, the war front advanced and came closer, and the prisoners of the camp were taken out on the death march, Grossman collapsed and died with his camera on him. The negatives of his photographs hidden by him in the ghetto, were found by Mendel’s sister and sent to Israel, but most of them were lost during the War of Independence, when Egyptian troops captured the Nitzanim kibbutz.

One of Mendel’s closest friends Nahman Zonabend remained in the Lodz ghetto until its liberation. Although the Nazis kept him under constant surveillance, he succeeded in saving the archives of the Judenrat, and he concealed the documentary treasure, including some of Mendel’s photographs, at the bottom of a well.

After the war this material was taken out of Poland. The archives were collected and are now housed in the Museum of Holocaust and Resistance at the Ghetto Fighters House in Kibbutz Lohamei Hagetaot Israel. 

Also the photographs taken by Mendel Grossman were used in the book With a Camera in the Ghetto, published in America in 1977.   



Essay:




Mendal Grossman (born in 1913) was a Jewish photographer during the Holocaust who lived in the Lodz Ghetto. Grossman recorded what happened in the ghettos through photographs. He photographed everyday life, the Jews condemned to deaths last moments before they went to gas-vans, punishments of families and more. He often photographed children in the Ghetto to show how the innocence minds were corrupted. The people of the ghetto encouraged Grossman to take photos went he felt that the incidents were too degrading. One man said “Let it remain for the future, let others know how humiliated we were”. To fool the police he carried his camera under his coat, he cut open the pockets of his coats to manipulate the camera. He directed the lens by turning his body.

The image shows two Jewish children in the ghetto. One of them is dressed as a policeman. Behind them is a wall and factories, the wall could possibly be the wall of the ghetto, keeping them from the outside world. The boy dressed as a policeman may be one of the kids the Nazis recruited to be part Jewish Ghetto police called the Judenrat. The Judenrat did not usually did have wear uniforms but could be identified by an armband, as seen in the picture. The Nazis did this is brainwash the young into doing work for them as they were innocent to see the horrific meanings behind them. Another denotation of the picture could be that the kids were ‘playing police’. This shows how the children were being influenced to thinking the way the Jews were treated was normal and okay.

There are many studium’s in the picture. People can be initially drawn to the colour and tone of the photo which portrays the age of the image. The black and white, grainy image connotes how the photo is old and from the war, making you interested in the story behind it, due to many stories of WW2 being lost. Another studium is the armband and the outfits of the children. The not to fit clothes denotes poorness and scruffy, as if they are living in poor conditions. Lastly, I was mostly drawn into the long chimney in the background. From my own knowledge of going to Auschwitz I can remember chimneys similar to this used on chambers etc. This draw me in as it presents terrible danger behind their innocent smiling faces. Sometimes the ghettos were close to camps. For example the Krakow Ghetto was close to Plasow labour camp, so it wouldn’t be a surprise if it was a gas chamber chimney.

Although the photo would likely upset viewers in today’s society. Grossman may not have taken it to portray the sad aspects of the Ghetto. He could have been showcasing the more happier and innocent games or moments in the war, to shows how people still had hope and tried their hardest the live a normal life and to not let the Nazis take away their identity.